Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine,
Seattle, Washington, USA
Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells, usually in the form
of marrow grafts, has been increasingly used over the last 21/2
decades to treat patients with various malignant and nonmalignant
hematological diseases. The number of transplants is steadily increasing
worldwide. Marrow for transplantation is usually obtained by aspiration
from the iliac crests. It is placed into tissue culture medium and
screened before infusion into the recipient. The marrow is composed
of a mixture of cells including large numbers of differentiated
and mature cells, many committed progenitors with defined function
and limited proliferation potential, and rare pluripotent stem cells
that have broad developmental and proliferative potential. The ability
of the pluripotent stem cells not only to self-renew, but also to
differentiate into the various committed hematopoietic precursors,
has made marrow transplantation possible. After the marrow harvest
and screening, the marrow is placed into a blood administration
bag and infused intravenously into the recipient whose underlying
disease has been eradicated and whose immune system suppressed by
high doses of chemoradiotherapy .Infused stem cells circulate through
the blood stream and, presumably with the help of homing receptors,
enter the marrow cavity , attach to the stroma bed, and begin to
divide under the influence of humoral and cellular stimuli. In most
recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants, the cell inoculum
settles in uneventfully. With extraordinary speed, the progenitor
cells produce progeny 0 The first mature cells begin to appear in
the circulation within 2-3 weeks of transplantation, normal granulocyte
and platelet counts may be reached as early as day 40 to 50 after
transplant, and normal hematocrit values are seen between the second
and third months after transplantation. In most patients, hematopoiesis
is entirely of marrow donor origin, although a minority may show
a mixture of host and donor cells. Hematopoiesis is stable. The
longest survivors after marrow transplantation have passed the 25-year
mark, and they display a completely normal hematopoietic and immune
system of donor type. Recent studies using molecular probes for
methylation site polymorphisms on the inactivated X-chromosome have
shown that hematopoietic repopulation after transplantation is of
polyclonal origin, although one group of investigators reported
clonal origin in a small minority of patients (1,2). Factors governing
the fate of the marrow transplant include the immunosuppressive
effects of the conditioning programs, the degree of histoincompatibility
between donor and recipient, the composition of the cells in the
graft, and the quality of the marrow bed. Inadequacies with any
of these factors may lead to a problem, graft failure. With HLA-identical
sibling donors, most grafts are successful. Graft failure is seen
in less than 2% of recipients. In contrast with HLA-haploidentical
family members who are mismatched for 1, 2 or 3 HLA-Ioci on the
nonshared haplotype, graft rejection is seen in 7-20% of cases (3,4).
In almost 80% of patients with graft failure, residual host lymphocytes
could be seen in the peripheral blood, which is suggestive of host-mediated
immune rejection. Graft failure is accompanied by a case fatality
rate of 97%. Studies in a canine model of marrow transplantation
had predicted that engraftment problems might arise in the HLA-nonidentical
transplant setting (5). While grafts with marrow from DLA-identical
littermates were successful in 95% of the cases, transplants from
DLA-haploidentical littermates or DLA-nonidentical unrelated dogs
had graft failure rates of 92% and 95 % 0 , respectively. At the
time of rejection, dogs showed an increase in peripheral blood large
granular lymphocytes of host type which functioned as natural killer
cells (NK cells) (6). In coculture experiments, these recipient
cells suppressed marrow colony-forming unit granulocytemacrophage
production, not only from donor marrow but also from marrow of unrelated
dogs that were either phenotypically DLA-identical or DLA-nonidentical
with the marrow donor, consistent with the notion of cytotoxicity
which was not restricted by the major histocompatibility complex
(MHC) (Raff et al., unpublished). In agreement with the notion that
NK-Iike cells were involved in graft rejection was the finding that
agents directed against macrophages and T lymphocytes were ineffective
in enhancing marrow engraftmentacross MHC barriers in the dog. Accordingly,
we developed monoclonal antibodies (MAb) that recognized those host
cells which mediate rejection. To this purpose we harvested canine
marrow cells 6 days after TBI and immunized mice. Among the antibodies
produced, one, S5, had a broad hematopoietic distribution, binding
to normal marrow cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, granulocytes
and lymph node lymphocytes. The antibody was used in a controlled
in vivo experiment in which dogs were given 9.2 Gy of TBI followed
by DLA-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts (7). In this setting,
graft failure was seen in 33 of 36 control dogs not given additional
therapy, in 6 of 7 dogs given the isotype matched irrelevant MAb
6.4 before TBI, and in only 4 of 19 dogs given antibody S5 at a
dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day from day -7 to day -2 before TBI. Thus, antibody
S5 resulted in a significant enhancement of engraftment over that
seen in control dogs given either no antibody or an isotype matched
irrelevant antibody. Subsequent work using techniques of sequential
immunoprecipitation, tryptic digestion, and N-glyconase digestion
revealed antibody 55 to detect the CD44 antigen (8). CD44 functions
in cell-cell and extracellular matrix adhesions and has been implicated
in lymphocyte traffic. It is also involved in T cell activation
via CD2 and CD3. Binding of anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies causes
secretion of IL-l and TNF-alfa. Further studies using positive selection
have shown CD44 to be expressed on hematopoietic stem cells that
can repopulate dog marrow after a supralethal dose of TBI. The mechanism
by which an antibody to CD44 enhances engraftment across a major
histocompatibility barrier is as yet unexplained. Alternative modes
of action include that MAb 55 affects traffic of host immune cells,
thereby permitting marrow to home, or increases the radiosensitivity
of host NK cells thought to be involved in graft resistance. Elucidation
of these mechanisms is important for clinical application of antibody-mediated
enhancement of marrow grafts. Previous studies in dogs indicated
that hematopoietic stem cells express MHC class II molecules as
recognized by the anti-class II MAb 7.2 (9,10). Treatment of canine
marrow in vitro with antibody 7.2 and rabbit complement prevents
autologous marrow engraftment after lethal TBI, whereas selected
7.2-positive marrow cells are capable of permanently repopulating
the hematopoietic system of irradiated dogs. Class II molecules
are differentially expressed on hematopoietic progenitor cells of
man. Committed progenitor cells assayed as colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage,
mixed colonies, and burst-forming unit erythroid express HLA-DR
and DP antigens whereas colony-forming units erythroid are predominantly
HLA-DR negative. Low HLA-DR expression has been seen on murine and
human long-term marrow culture initiating cells. It is not clear
whether truly pluripotent stem cells express class II MHC antigens.
If present, the class II molecules on stem cells could have significant
clinical implications, because investigators have described a possible
role of HLA-D restricted cell interactions in hematopoiesis. Such
restrictions could be important for interactions between transplantable
cells and as yet undetected accessory cells in the hematopoietic
microenvironment. We have established a model of canine marrow autografts
after 9.2 ay TBI to study the role of class II antigens in hematopoietic
stem cell growth and differentiation (11). Twenty dogs were given
9.2 ay TBI marrow and intravenous murine anti-class II MAb. Infusion
of 0.6 mg/kg/day of antibody H81.98.21, an Iga2a MAb reactive with
HLA-DR, on days 0 to 4 after TBI did not prevent initial engraftment,
but all dogs died with late graft failure. The critical time for
effect of the antibody is during the first 4 days after transplant.
Results of extensive studies argued against several pathogenetic
mechanisms, including removal of antibody coated stem cells by the
reticuloendothelial system, canine complement-mediated cytotoxic
effects on stem cells, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity
, and inactivation of antibody coated cells by dog anti-mouse antibody.
To distinguish between antibody-induced damage to microenvironment/accessory
cells and late graft failure from lack of pluripotent stem cells,
three dogs were given TBI, a marrow autograft, and antibody H81.98.21
on days 0 to 4; one given thoracic duct lymphocytes on day 6 developed
graft failure; the other two given marrow depleted of accessory
cells by L-Ieucil L-Ieucine O-methyl ester had sustained grafts.
Findings support the notion that originally transplanted pluripotent
stem cells are no longer present on day 6 and that the marrow microenvironment
is functional and able to support newly injected stem cells. These
initial observations on the development of graft failure after injection
of MAb to class II during the early period after transplant suggest
a role for class II molecules in the engraftment and/or regulation
of pluripotent stem cells required for sustained marrow function.
The mechanism by which MAb to class II induce late marrow graft
failure is currently under investigation (12). Hematopoietic engraftment
of donor type is "permanent" in human patients as indicated by blood
genetic marker studies in patients, many of whom have now been followed
for 10-25 years after transplant. Given the permanence of the engraftment
and the fact that recovery in most patients is polyclonal, gene
transfer into hematopoietic stem cells has become an attractive
possibility .Gene transfer might be used to inhibit or alter genes
causing disease, for example, in patients with hemoglobinopathies
or inborn errors of metabolism, to confer drug resistance to marrow
cells in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, and to transfer
histocompatibility genes with the aim of inducing tolerance to MHC
gene products. For gene therapy to be accomplished, a sample of
the patient's marrow would be obtained, placed into a long-term
culture system, and exposed to a retroviral vector containing the
genes of interest. In the interim, the patient would be treated
to eradicate the underlying disease. That accomplished, the transduced
marrow would be injected in hopes that genes would be expressed
in the progeny of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Our work was conducted
in a preclinical canine model using two Moloney leukemia virus based
vectors, LNCA and LASN, which contain both the neomycin phosphotransferase
gene and a human adenosine deaminase gene (13,14). The system was
helper virus free. Two approaches were taken. In one, prospective
recipient dogs were treated with canine recombinant granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor for 7 days. Then, marrow was harvested
and placed into long-term culture which was regularly fed with supernatant
from a virusproducing feeder layer. After the marrow was in culture
for 4 days, the dog was given 9.2 ay of TBI and the transduced marrow
infused. The dog was then treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor until hematopoietic engraftment. The other approach involved
pretreatment of the recipient dog with a dose of 40 mg of cyclophosphamide
per kg intravenously, a maneuver which led to profound pancytopenia.
At the time of greatest pancytopenia, marrow was harvested and cocultivated
for 48 hours with a viral-producing feeder layer. Then the dog was
given 9.2 Gy of TBI and the marrow was infused. The dog then received
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor until recovery of peripheral
blood granulocyte counts. Six dogs were treated with long-term cultured
marrow. Of these six, two died with intercurrent infection, on the
day of TBI and marrow transplantation and on day 15, respectively,
while four became long-term survivors. The four are surviving between
2 and more than 4 years after transplant. Of the four animals treated
with cyclophosphamide, two died with pneumonia on days 1 and 12
after TBI, respectively, and two are surviving between 2 and more
than 4 years after transplant. At regular intervals, marrow has
been harvested from these dogs and placed into colony-forming unit
granulocytemacrophage cultures with and without the chemical G418
to test for neomycin resistance. For now up to more than 4 years
after transplant, between 1% and 10% G418-resistant colony-forming
units granulocytemacrophage have been found in each of the six surviving
animals, indicating successful gene transfer . Furthermore, peripheral
blood granulocytes, peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymph node lymphocytes,
and marrow cells have all been tested for both the presence of the
neomycin phosphotransferase gene and the adenosine deaminase gene
using a polymerase chain reaction based test. The genes were found
to be present for up to more than 4 years. Dogs have remained healthy.
Tests for helper virus have remained negative. These data indicate
for the first time successful and persistent transduction of long-term
repopulating marrow cells in a large random bred species. It is
clear that much work still needs to be done to increase the relatively
low levels of gene expression in vivo through improvements in the
development of both retroviral vectors and of packaging cell lines
so that the highest possible virus titers can be generated in the
absence of any detectable helper virus. Perhaps results can be improved
through the use of various hematopoietic growth factors. Much work
needs to be done in regards to developing safe conditioning programs
for the recipient which do not cause life threatening pancytopenias.
As our understanding of gene transfer techniques increases and our
knowledge of gene regulation in the course of differentiation improves,
gene transfer for the treatment of hematopoietic disorders may one
day become clinical reality .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants HL36444, CA18221, CA31787, CA18029,
and CA15704 from the National Institutes of Health, DHHS.
REFERENCES
1. Nash R, Storb R, Neiman P. Polyclonal reconstitution of human
marrow after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1988;72:2031-2037.
2. Turhan AG, Humphries RK, Phillips GL, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Clonal
hematopoiesis demonstrated by X-Iinked DNA polymorphisms after allogeneic
bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 1655-1661.
3. Beatty PG, Clift RA, Mickelson EM et al. Marrow transplantation
from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. N Engl J
Med 1985;313: 765-771.
4. Anasetti C, Amos D, Beatty PG et al. Effect ofHLA compatibility
on engraftment of bone marrow transplants in patients with leukemia
or lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 197-204.
5. Storb R, Deeg HJ. Failure of allogeneic canine marrow grafts
after total body irradiation: Allogeneic "resistance" vs transfusion
induced sensitization. Transplantation 1986;42:571-580.
6. Raff RF, Deeg HJ, Loughran TP,Jr. et al. Characterization of
host cells involved in resistance to marrow grafts in dogs transplanted
from unrelated DLA-nonidentical donors. Blood 1986;68:861-868.
7. Schuening F, Storb R, Goehle Set al. Facilitation of engraftment
ofDLA-nonidentical marrow by treatment of recipients with monoclonal
antibody directed against marrow cells surviving radiation. Transplantation
1987;44:607-613.
8. Sandmaier BM, Storb R, Appelbaum FR et al. An antibody that facilitates
hematopoietic engraftment recognizes CD44. Blood 1990;76:630-635.
9. Szer J, Deeg HJ, Appelbaum FR, Storb R. Failure of autologous
marrow reconstitution after cytolytic treatment of marrow with anti-Ia
monoclonal antibody. Blood 1985;65:819-822.
10. Schuening F, Storb R, Goehle Set al. Canine pluripotent hemopoietic
stem cells and cFu-GM express la-Iike antigens as recognized by
two different class-II specific monoclonal antibodies. Blood 1987;69:165-172.
11. areinix HT, Ladiges WC, Graham TC et al. Late failure of autologous
marrow grafts in lethally irradiated dogs given anti-class-1I monoclonal
antibody. Blood 1991;78:2131-2138.
12. areinix HT, Storb R, Bartelmez SH. Specific growth inhibition
of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells mediated through monoclonal
antibody binding to major histocompatibility class II molecules.
Blood 1992;80:1950-1956.
13. Schuening Fa, Storb R, Stead RB et al. Improved retroviral transfer
of genes into canine hematopoietic progenitor cells kept in long-term
marrow culture. Blood 1989;74:152-155.
14. Schuening Fa, Kawahara K, Miller DA et al. Retrovirus-mediated
gene transduction into long-term repopulating marrow cells of dogs.
Blood 1991;78:2568-2576.
|