| 
             1. The N. N. Petrov Research Institute of On cology, 
              USSR Ministry of Health, Lenin grad, USSR.  
              2. The B. P. Konstantinov Research Institute of Nuclear Physics, 
              USSR Academy of Science, Gatchina, Leningrad, USSR.  
              3. The M. M. Shemyakin Research Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 
              USSR Academy of Science, Moscow, USSR  
             
              Introduction  
            It is widely accepted that tumor development and progression are 
              due to illegitimate activation of cellular oncogenes by point mutation, 
              retroviral insertion, chromosomal translocation and amplification 
              or deletion of the genc [1- 3]. Nonrandom deletions of chromosomal 
              regions 13q14 and 11p13 have been detected in retinoblastoma [1] 
              and Wilm's tumor [2, 3]. It has been proposed that these rare childhood 
              cancers result from the deletion of dominant-acting genes, permitting 
              the expression of tumorigenic recessive alleles [1 ]. Moreover, 
              restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis has demonstrated 
              loss of H-ras.I oncogene allele (chromosome 11 p 15) in primary 
              bladder, breast, ovarian, and lung carcinomas [4- 7]. On the other 
              hand, another important mechanism of activation of ra.s oncogene 
              (including H-rasI) have been shown in 10-15% of certain types of 
              human tumors, which involved a point mutation, causing an alteration 
              at amino acid positions 12, 13 or 61 of the ras gene product p21 
              ras [8]. The study discusses the possible supressive action of the 
              wild-type H-ras.I allele on the mutant one in breast cancer. 
             
              Material and Methods  
            The RFLP of H-rasI oncogene was analyzed in 76 primary breast carcinomas 
              as described [7]. H-ra.sI sequence spanning 145 base pairs across 
              cod on 12 was amplified in vitro by Thermu.s thermophyfus DNA polymerase 
              [9]. Subscquent MspI digestion allowed us to detect the mutation 
              in "hot spot" due to the loss of the restriction site for MspI in 
              the case of substitution in the 12th codon of H-rasI [10].  
               
             
            
                
               
              Fig. I. Deletions of one of H-rasI allele in breast carcinomas 
              (BC), identified by means of PvuII restriction of DNA samples, Southern 
              blotting and hybridization with 6,6-fragment of pEl [II]. Samples 
              of DNA were derived from (I) BCI2 -genotype A1/A1; (2) leukocytes 
              of BC9 constitutive genotype A 1/A2; (3) BC9 A1/A2, deletion of 
              A2 allele; (4) BC 5 -A 1/ A 2, deletion of A 1 allele; and (5) BC 
              31 genotype A 1/ A3. Slight hybridization signals at the place of 
              lost A 2 (3) and A 1 (4) alleles are due to the contamination of 
              the tumors by normal cells. In BC 107 and BC 109 the same deletions 
              were detected as in BC9 (3)  
            
             
               
               
             
            
                
               
              Fig.2. Detection of H-rasI mutation in codon 12. The 145 
              base pair (bp) DNA sequence across 12th codon (in the frame) was 
              amplified in vitro using the oligonucleotide primers (large open 
              arrows indicate the 5' 3' orientation of the primers [9]. MspI digestion 
              of the amplified sequences result in three fragments (25, 56, and 
              64 bp) in the case of wild-type allele, and two fragments (25 and 
              120 bp) in the case of substitution in codon 12 that altered msp 
              site of restriction (vertical arrows). The photograph demonstrates 
              the products of amplification of BC5 (1), BC9 (3), and BC107, BC109 
              (not shown) DNA samples and MspI restriction (3, 4, and 6, respectively). 
              Arrows on the right of the photograph indicate bands corresponding 
              to mutant and wild-type alleles. Alu fragments of pBR322 DNA (standard) 
              are pointed out on the left of the photo 
            
 
              Results and Discussion  
            Restriction analyses of 76 DNA samples from primary breast carcinomas 
              revealed deletions of one of the H -rasI allele in ten out of 41 
              (25% ) heterozygous patients (Fig.1). Enzymatic amplification and 
              Msp restriction showed the presence of point mutation in the undeleted 
              H-rasl allele in four out of ten carcinomas with the allelic loss 
              (Fig. 2). All four mutations identified were the G-to- T transversion 
              in the second position of cod on 12 (Fig. 3).  
               
             
             
             
               
              Fig.3. Nucleotide sequence of the H-rasI oncogene fragment, 
              containing the 12th codon with G-to- T transversion. The sequence 
              was determined by means of a 8% polyacriamide sequencing gel and 
              the Maxam and Gilbert procedure [12]. Arrows indicate the codon 
              12 and the mutated band 
             The loss of intact H-rasI allele and consequently its product 
              -p21 ras -nor mally involved in transport of mitogenic signal in 
              the cell, might potentiate transforming activity of the oncoprotein, 
              coded by the mutant allele. The deletion of wild-type allele of 
              H-rasI oncogene is likely to unmask the mutant one. Nevertheless 
              it is possible that another cellular constraint of growth is present 
              on chromosome 11 p 13-p 15, and that the loss of this suppressor 
              locus leads to activation of normally repressed class of genes. 
             
             
              References  
            1. Cavenee WK, Dryja TP, Phillips RA, Benedict WF, Godbourt R, 
              Gallie BL, Murphree AL, Strong LC, White RL (1983) Nature 305:779-784 
               
              2. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B, Feinberg AP (1984) Nature 309.176-178 
               
              3. Koufos A, Hansen MF, Copc1and NC, Jenkins NA, Lampkin BC, Cavenec 
              WK (1985) Nature 316.330-334 
              4. Fearon EF, Feinberg AP, Hamilton SH, Vogelstein B (1985) Nature 
              318.377-380 
              5. Theillet C, Lidereau R, Escot C, Hutzell P, Brunet M, Gcst J, 
              Schlom J, Callahan R (1986) Cancer Rcs 46:4776-4781  
              6. Yokota J, Tsunetsugu- Y okota Y, Batti fera H, Lc Fevre C, Cline 
              MJ (1986) Science 231.261-265  
              7. Knyazev PG, Nikiforova IF, Serova OM, Novikov LB, Pluzhnikova 
              GF, Abramov AM, Seitz IF (1989) In: Neth R, et aI. (eds) Modern 
              trends in leukcmia IX. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 
              433-435  
              8. Bos JL (1989) Proc NatJ Acad Sci USA 
              9. Stcvans CW, Monoharan TH, Fahl WE (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 
              85:3875-3879  
              10. Reddy EP (1983) Scicnce 220:1061-1063  
              11. ShjhC,WeinbergRA(1982) Cell 29:161- 169  
              12. Maxam A, Gilbert W (1977) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74.560-564 
             
           |