* University of Minnesota Hospitals and Clinics,
420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
A.Introduction
Bone marrow transplantation is now in frequent use for the treatment
of a number of hematologic diseases, including severe immune deficiencies,
aplastic anemias, and acute and chronic leukemias. In allogeneic
transplantation, a problem remains with graft versus host disease-producing
immunocompetent cells which con taminate the marrow. In autologous
transplantation for treatment of the leukemias, residual leukemic
cells may result in the return of unwanted cells to the recipient.
Thus, an objective for both autologous and allogeneic marrow transplantation
has become the removal of these unwanted cells prior to infusion
into the recipient. In our institutions, the approach to the problem
of purging marrow of unwanted leukemic or GVHD-producing cells has
been the development of monoclonal antibodies that bind to surfaces
of leukemic or GVHD-producing cells. Such monoclonal antibodies
have several advantages over alternative means of purging marrow.
First, an advantage over pharmacologic means is that the antibodies
are highly specific for molecular determinants that are characteristic
of particular cells. Second, these monoclonal antibodies have the
advantage over previously produced heteroantisera in that large
quantities of highly specific antibody may be produced in a very
standardized manner. The current approach taken by ourselves and
others is to utilize antibodies which are well characterized with
respect to binding of unwanted cells, but do not bind to stem cells.
Highly specific reagents can be used in this way to treat marrow
in vitro without the need to administer potentially toxic substances
to patients in vivo. An additional reason for the in vitro use of
such reagents is to avoid the uncertain and often toxic effects
of agents administered in vivo. With the use of antibodies in vitro,
an adequate killing mechanism must be provided. In vivo killing
mechanisms, such as through complement activation, are not sufficiently
dependable to be reliable, as we observed in our earlier studies
of marrow purging [I]. Thus, our recent studies have focused on
in vitro killing. We have used antibody plus rabbit serum as a complement
source [2], or alternatively, antibody conjugated to the potent
toxin, ricin, derived from the castor bean [3]. These antibody-ricin
conjugates which represent a new class of pharmacologic reagents
have been developed at the National Institute of Mental Health [4,
5]. We have found both complement and ricin-mediated killing to
be effective in vitro [2, 3] and studies are currently underway
comparing the two forms of cell killing. Antibody-ricin immunotoxin
conjugates have an advantage over antibody alone in that they can
be produced in standardized form without reliance on the complex
complement cascade. Not all antibodies produce effective ricin conjugates,
however, in that high affinity antibodies are generally required
for efficient specific killing [6].
Table I. Monoclonal antibodies
and immunotoxins for marrow transplantation; purging bone marrow
of ALL or GVHD-producing cells
B. T Lineage Antibodies for Removal of GVHD-Producing
T Lymphocytes from Allogeneic Marrow
or Leukemic T Lymphocytes from Autologous Marrow
A major use for monoclonal antibodies is to purge marrow of GVHD-producing
T lymphocytes. A great deal of evidence has accumulated to indicate
the T Iymphocytedepleted marrow can result in effective engraftment
without GVHD, despite transplantation across major transplantation
barriers in the rodent [7, 8]. In our studies, marrow has been effectively
depleted of T lymphocytes in mice by antibody plus complement [8]
or in more recent experiments by antibody conjugated to ricin [9].
The ricin molecule is composed of two chains, A and B. The A chain
is responsible for killing via inhibition of protein synthesis at
the level of the 60 S ribosome. Conjugates containing B chain generally
kill more effectively and exhibit more efficient cell killing per
occupied receptor than conjugates made with A chain alone [ 10].
Ricin B chain binds to branched galactosyl residues on the cell
surface; conjugates containing B chain are made specific for the
target cell by blocking ricin binding to non-target cells with lactose
[ II ]. In our clinical studies, intact ricin is currently in use.
Ricin used in these experiments is conjugated using a heterobifunctional
cross-linker resulting in a thioether linkage [5]. We have extensively
studied three anti- T lymphocyte antibodies, each of which binds
to a unique determinant on T cell surfaces {Table I). The antibody
TA-l binds to a gp 170/95 kilodaltons structure as previously described
[12, 13]. The antibody UCHTI is a CD3 antibody which binds to a
p19/29 kilodalton structure as previously described [14]. The third
antibody, T101, is a CD5 antibody, which binds to a p65 kilodalton
structure as previously described [15]. These three antibodies have
been conjugated to ricin as already discussed. The antibody-ricin
immunotoxin conjugates have been studied extensively relative to
inhibition of T cell function in the PHA assay, the generation of
cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and the inhibition of stem cell growth
[3]. These studies indicate that while each of these conjugates
individually are effective in cellular killing, T lymphocyte activity
can be further reduced by about 1 log when the conjugates are used
as an equal part mixture, designated TUT. Based on preclinical studies
suggesting the high efficiency of the TUT-ricin immunotoxin cocktail
for T cell removal, we have proceeded to phase I-II clinical studies
in which HLA-matched sibling donor marrow has been treated in vitro
with the TUT-ricin cocktail prior to administration to sibling recipients
[16]. Preliminary results indicate that marrow engraftment is extremely
prompt, indicating no undue toxicity to marrow stem cells. No toxicity
has been observed in the patients following administration of the
immunotoxin-treated marrow [16]. To date, a total of eight patients
have been followed for a sufficient period for evaluation (Filipovich
et al., in preparation). Severe GVHD was observed in none of the
patients and two developed steroid-responsive Grade 1-2 GVHD. Of
concern was the fact that one patient, who showed prompt engraftment,
subsequently had graft failure, presumably due to rejection. Based
on these preliminary observations a phase III trial of TUT immunotoxin-treated
marrow in HLAmatched combinations appears warranted. Preclinical
studies have been performed using T antibodies conjugated to ricin
for autologous marrow transplantation in T cell acute leukemia.
These studies indicate that the antibodies TI01 and TA-l bind to
most T cell leukemias and that killing in a clonogenic assay is
extremely effective, particularly with TIOI, where greater than
5 log of killing was observed [ 17]. Three patients with acute T
cell leukemia have had autologous marrow treated with the T cell
antibody~ricin conjugates and in each case prompt engraftment was
observed (Kersey et al., in preparation). The first patient treated
in this manner had skin nodules prior to intensive treatment with
total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide. She subsequently relapsed
in the skin, suggesting, that the relapse occurred from inadequate
treatment of leukemia in vivo, rather than from inadequate removal
of leukemia cells from the marrow. This case illustrates that when
adequate control is obtained of leukemia in vivo, efficacy of marrow
cleanup will be easier to ascertain. Phase I-II studies of T cell
antibody-ricin conjugates for transplantation in T leukemia continue
in our institution.
C. B Lineage-Associated Antibodies for Autologous Transplantation
in ALL
The vast majority of cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia appear
to be derived from B lineage progenitor cells based on studies of
immunoglobulin gene rearrangement and immunoglobulin gene expression;
consistent with these observations are the data indicating that
B lineage-associated antibodies bind to these leukemias [18]. Three
B lineage-associated ALL antibodies have been produced and extensively
studied at Minnesota. These are BA-I, BA-2, and BA-3 (Table I).
BA-I binds to about 85% of cases of ALL, but does not bind to multipotent
stem cells [19]. BA-2 is an antip24 antibody that binds to most
B lineage ALL, but not stem cells [20]. BA-3 is an anti-gpIOO/CALLA
antibody [21]. The three antibodies have been recently shown to
be very effective as a cocktail with complement for the killing
of ALL cells in a clonogenic assay [22]. Based on the preclinical
studies describing the efficacy of that cocktail ofBA-I, 2,3 for
removal of clonogenic cells in the presence of complement, we have
begun phase I-II clinical trials in ALL. High risk patien ts whose
leukemic cells are BA-I, 2, or 3 positive are eligible. Patients
are generally those who have previously relapsed and are back in
remission. Remission marrow is treated and stored while the patient
recieves intensive therapy and total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide.
To date, 21 patients have been treated and followed at least 2 months.
Preliminary analysis indicates that patients have generally had
prompt engraftment, consistent with the in vitro studies demonstrating
lack of stem cell reactivity of the cocktail of BA-I, 2, 3 plus
complement (Ramsay et al., 1985, Blood, in press). The only toxicity
of the treatment was observed in several patients early in the study
who recieved marrow that was contaminated with gram-positive organisms,
presumably a consequence of marrow collection and manipulation.
This is currently an ongoing study in our institution and similar
to studies under way elsewhere.
D. Conclusions
Extensive preclinical studies have been performed with the use
of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-ricin immunotoxin conjugates
for purging marrow of unwanted cells. Purging of marrow has now
been used in phase I-II clinical trials for both autologous and
allogeneic marrow transplantation. The lack of in vivo toxicity
of antibody or ricin and the lack of apparent stem cell toxicity
is encouraging. Efficacy of marrow purging for removal of GVHDproducing
cells in allogeneic transplantation or leukemic cells in autologous
transplantation will be determined following additional clinical
studies.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Hybritech, Inc., San Diego, for sufficient quantities
of BA-I, 2, 3, TA-l, and TI01 and Peter Beverly for UCHTI used in
the studies described herein. These studies were supported in part
by Hybritech, Incorporated and the following grants from the National
Cancer Institute: POI-CA21737, ROI-CA-25097, and ROI-CA-31685. T.
LeBien is a scholar of the Leukemia Society of America, A. Filipovich
is a Clinical Investigator of the NIH.
References
1. Filipovich AH, Ram say NKC, Warkentin P, McGlave PB, Goldstein
G, Kersey 1H (1982) Pretreatment of donor bone marrow with monoclonal
antibody OKT3 for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease
in allogeneic histocompatible bone marrow transplantation. Lancet
1/8284: 1266-1269
2. LeBien TW, Ash RC, Zanjani ED, Kersey 1H ( 1983) In vitro destruction
of leukemic cells using a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies. In:
Neth R (ed) Modern trends in human leukemia V. Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg NewYork,pp 112-115
3. Vallera DA, Ash RC. Zanjani ED, Kersey 1H. LeBien TW. Beverly
PCL, Neville DM 1r. Youle R1 ( 1983) Anti- T-cell reagents for human
bone marrow transplantation: ricin linked to three monoclonal antibodies.
Science 222:512-515
4. Youle R1, Neville DM 1r (1980) Anti-thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody
linked to ricin is a potent cell-type-specific toxin. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 77: 5483-5486
5. U.S. Patent No 4,539. 457, Anti-thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody-ricin
hybrid utilized as a tumor suppressant. Neville DM 1r, Youle R1
U.S. Patent No 4,440.747. Monoclonal antibody-ricin as a treatment
of animal graft versus host disease. Neville DM 1r. Youle R1
6. Neville DM 1r, Youle R1 (1982) Monoclonal antibody-ricin or ricin
A chain hybrids: kinetic analysis of cell killing for tumor therapy.
Immunol Rev 62: 135
7. Rodt HV, Thierfelder S, Eulitz M (1972) Suppression of acute
secondary disease by heterologous anti-brain serum. Blut 25: 385
-389
8. Vallera DA, Soderling CCB, Carlson G1. Kersey 1H ( 1981 ) Bone
marrow transplantation across major histocompatibility barriers
in mice: the effect of elimination of T cells from donor grafts
by treatment with monoclonal thy 1.2 plus complement or antibody
alone. Transplantation 3 I: 218-222
9. Vallera DA, Youle R1. Neville DM 1r, Kersey 1H ( 1982) Bone marrow
transplantation across major histocompatibility barriers V. Protection
of mice from lethal GVHD by pretreatment of donor cells with monoclonal
anti-thy 1.2 coupled to the toxin lectin ricin. 1 Exp Med 155:949-954
10. Youle R1, Neville DM 1r (1979) Receptormediated transport of
the hybrid protein ricin-diphtheria toxin fragment A with subsequent
ADP-ribosylation of intracellular elongation factor 11.1 Bioi Chem
24: I 1089
II. Youle R1, Murray 11, Neville DM 1r (1979) Ricin linked to monophosphopentamannose
bind to fibroblasts lysozomes hydrolase receptors resulting in a
cell-type specific toxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 5559
12. LeBien TW, Kersey 1H (1980) A monoclonal antibody (TA-l) reactive
with human T lymphocytes and monocytes. 1 Imm unol 125 : 2208-2214
13. LeBien TW, Bradley 1G. Koller B (1983) Preliminary structural
characterization of the leukocyte cell surface molecule recognized
by monoclonal antibody TA-l. 1 Immunol 130: 1833-1836
14. Beverley PCL, Callard RE (1981) Distinctive functional characteristics
of human T lymphocytes defined by E rosetting or a monoclonal anti-
T cell antibody. Eur 1 Immunol 11:329
15. Royston I, Majda A. Baird SM, Meserve BL, Griffiths 1C ( 1979)
Monoclonal antibody specific for human T Iymphocyte-identification
of normal and malignant T-cells. Blood 54: 1069
16. Filipovich AH, Vallera DA. Youle RJ, Quinones RA, Neville DM
1r, Kersey 1H (1984) Ex vivo treatment of donor bone marrow with
anti- T -cell immunotoxins for the prevention of graft versus host
disease. Lancet 1:469-471
17. Stong RC, Youle R1. VaIlera DA (1984) Elimination of clonogenic
T -leukemic cells from human bone marrow using anti-Mr 65000 protein
immunotoxins. Cancer Res 4: 3000 -3006
18. Korsmeyer S1. Arnold A. Bakhshi A, Ravetch 1V, Siebenlist U,
Hieter PA, Sharrow SO, LeBien TW, Kersey 1H, Poplack DG, Leder P,
Waldmann TA (1983) Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement and cell surface
antigen expression in acute Iymphocytic leukemias of T cell and
H cell precursor origins. J Clin Invest 71 :301-313
19. Abramson CS, Kersey JH, LeRien TW (1981) A monoclonal antibody
(HA-l) reactive with cells of human H lymphocyte lineage. J Immunol126:83-88
20. Kersey JH, LeBien TW, Abramson CS. Newman R, Sutherland R, Greaves
M (1981) p24: a human leukemia-associated and Iymphohemopoietic
progenitor cell surface structure identified with monoclonal antibody.J
Exp Med 153:726-731
21. LeBien TW, Roue DR, Bradley JG, Kersey JH ( 1982) Antibody affinity
may influence antigenic modulation of the common acute lymphoblastic
antigen in vitro. J Immunol 129:2287-2292
22. LeBien TW, Stepan DE, Bartholomew RM, Stong RC, Anderson J M
( 1985) Utilization of a colony assay to assess the variables influencing
elimination of leukemic cells from human bone marrow with monoclonal
antibodies and complement. Blood (in press)
|