for the Polish Acute Leukemia Group*
Department of Haematology, Siiesian Medical Academy Reymonta Str.8,40029
Katowice Poland
*Polish Acute Leukemia Study Group: Holowiecki J ,Cedrych 1.,Krzemien
S.,Rudzka E.,Holowiecka B.,Jagoda K., Krawczyk M., Hellmann A.,Maj
S.,Konopka L.,Dmoszynska A.,Krykowski E.,Robak T.,Kuratowska Z.,
Skotnicki A.
Intensive induction chemotherapy regimens has led to considerable
improvement in the prognosis of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia
( ALL ), but the results are still unsatisfactory and only about
35% of patients can be cured with current available therapy (7,10,11,14,
) .In conclusions from the studies of large series of adult ALL
the complete remission (CR) rate ranges from 70 to 85% ( 2,6,7,
9,10, 11, 14,16,23,27,30 ). A further intensification of chemotherapy
will increase CR rates but it is limited by hematopoietic toxicity
and therefore the use of recombinant human growth factors in addition
to induction chemotherapy has been attempted ( 13,18,19,22,23,25,29
). The studies on bone marrow cells kinetics during GM-CSF treatment
revealed, that 48 to 96 hours after GM-CSF discontinuation the proliferative
activity of normal stem cells and progenitors decreases to levels
lower than that observed prior to GM-CSF administration ( 1,5, 12,28
), so this represents a period of partial refractoriness of these
cells to the cell cycle dependent cytostatics. Based on the above
data as well as on pharmacokinetics of anthracyclines and after
successful completing of the pilot study ( 12 ), an original cell
kinetics based protocol using rhGM-CSF during induction and consolidation
treatment of adult ALL has been designed and evaluated in a multicenter,
randomized, prospective study. The aims of this study were as follows:
1) to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of recombinant human
GM-CSF in adult ALL patients, 2) to prove the concept that sequential
administration of cell cycle specyfic cytostatics and GM-CSF during
induction can enhance the myeloprotection by modulation of normal
stem cell kinetics, 3) to evaluate the efficacy of GM-CSF for prevention
of neutropenia after intensive consolidation therapy. Material and
methods. The multicenter, prospective, randomized trial, using GM-CSF
in adult ALL patients has been carried out in 8 departments of haematology.
Recombinant human GM-CSF (E.coli derived, Leucomax ) had been supplied
by Sandoz/Schering Plough. Fifty two consecutive, previously untreated
ALL adult patients were enrolled to the study ( F=22,M=30,median
age 29 (range16-59), immunological phenotypes: common=35, early
pre 8=7, pre TIT type=1 0, median WBC count=9,4 G\L, median Hb=9,35
g/l, median platelets count=59 G\L, hepatomegaly presented 63% of
patients, splenomegaly-65%, Iymphomegaly- 71% of patients) Patients
below 16 years and over 60 years old, FAB L3,ALL with "myeloid"
suface antigens, historyof anaphylaxis to human proteins, with severe
heart, liver,lung 0r kidney impairment, were the exclusion criteria.
After informed consent had been obtained, patients were stratified
according to risk groups the high risk one (age>35, WBC>30 G\L,
"common" negative, phenotype Ph+) and the standard risk one (none
of the above criteria). Within each group patients were randomized
to receive either chemotherapy plus GM-CSF (GM arm) or chemotherapy
alone (control arm). The patient's characteristics in each group
is presented in the table 1.
tab. 1 Material
The patients treated according to the schedule presented in fig.
1.
Fig. 1. Scheme of the treatment protocol
Recombinat human GM-CSF ( Leukomax ) , was subcutaneously, in daily
dose of 5 ug/kg body weight , during induction, in five day cycles,
each one was startet 36 hours after Farmorubicin and Vincristin
injection and discontinued 48 hours before the next injection of
cytostatics. After completion of the induction, as well as during
consolidation with Cyclophosphamide and HO ARA-C, GM-CSF was continued
until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in peripheral blood reached
1 G\l during three consecutive days. The peripheral blood morphology
with differential count, reticulocytes and platelets were monitored
three times a week. In addition, the monitoring of peripheral blood
CO34,CO38 positive cells was performed in 13 patients; 8 receiving
GM-CSF and 5 treated in the control arm (each time on the last day
of GM-CSF administration -days 3,20,27, and next after 48 hours,
just before cytosta-tics dministration -days 1,8,15,22. lmunophenothyping
of leukemic blasts at the start of induction and next peripheral
blood active stem cells measurements during induction performed
using flow cytometry immunoenzymatic APAAP staining. The statistal
analysis of survival was performed using original database programme
leukos 7 and Biomedical Package Software BMDP.
Results
The overall CR rate equalled 73%, with 90% CR in the standard risk
group and 62,5% in the high risk one. A higher CR rate of 80% has
been obtained in patiente treated with GM-CSF (GM arm) as compared
to the control group -66%. All patients in the "GM arm" achieved
CR after 1 induction cycle, whereas 33% of patients in the control
arm received more than 1 cycle of induction. The time to reach CR
in the "GM arm" was significantly shorter (median 29 days) than
in the control one (median 41 days) p<0.05. The particular results
obtained in each group of patients are schown in table 2.
tab. 2 Results of induction treatment
Analysis of bone marrow regeneration times revealed, that in the GM arm both the cytoreduction and the subsequent regeneration of particular haematopoetic lines occured significantly earlier than in the control arm (median of days to nadir granulocyte counts equaled 9 versus 15 days, p<0.05 and to nadir platelets 6.5 versus 12,5 days respectively, p<0.05 ). Times to granulocyte recovery and surprisingly also to platelets recovery were also significantly shorter in the "GM arm" than in the control one; median days to ANC >0.5 G\L 11 versus 28, to > 1 G\L 21,5 versus 33,5, to > 1,5 G\L 24 versus 34 days, p<0.05 , median of days to reach platelet count >50 G\L 8.5 versus 12 days, > 100 G/I 26,5 versus 33,5 days (p<0.05. The time to clearance of blasts from peripheral blood was also shorter in the GM arm (median 7 days) as compared to the control group (10 days).
fig.2 Cytoreduction and regeneration times
The use of GM-CSF shortened significantly the neutropenic period
during induction, the mean of days with ANC < 0.5 G\L in GM arm
equaled 10,6 as compared to 21,4 in the control arm (p<0.05) and
only 59% of GM-CSF treated patients displayed agranulocytosis, whereas
85% in the control group. The insidence and severity of infections
during induction were reduced in the GM-CSF treated group (only
9% of patients in GM arm developed infection of WHO grade 4, compared
to 23% in the control arm). As a consequence also the antibiotic
treatment was significantly reduced in the GM arm (p<0.05) fig 3.
fig.3 Number of days of agranulocytosis, antibiotics treatment
and fever compared in both groups
The need of RBC and platelets support during induction appeared
to be lower in the GM arm than in the control one; median RBC liters
equaled 1 ,5 versus 22,3, median platelets units 3 versus 3,8 respectively)
. During consolidation, the GM-CSF treatment as an adjunct to high
dose chemotherapy enabled a close adherence to the intensive therapy
regimen (the average dalay of the subsequent cycle equaled 0.5 day
in the MM arm versus 6.6 days in the control group, p<0.5). In the
"GM arm" the frequency of infection, the fever rate, and the usage
of antibiotics were also lower than in the control group. The current
follow up, reveales comparative results in both groups with not
significant differences between Kaplan Meyer DFS curves (Wilcoxon
Breslow-p=0.9,Mantel-Cox-p=0.6). The median CCR has not been reached
at the mean observation time of 601 days in GM arm and 525 days
in the control arm, although the tendency suggesting the better
outcome in GM-CSF arm appears ( 75 th quantile has not been reached
yet versus 298 days in control) -fig 4
fig. 4 Kaplan Meyer curves of disease free survival in both
groups of patients
Repeated dual color staining for CD34CD38 flow cytometry analyses
of a significant increase in the absolute count and percent mononeulear
and granulomonocytic fraction, during GM-CSF administration, followed
by the rapid decrease 48 hours after the cessation of the cytokine.
This phenomenon has been never observed in patients obtaining chemotherapy
only, who displayed a distinct decrease of CD34CD38 positive cell
count during the induction treatment. (fig.5)
fig. 5 The kinetics of peripheral blood CD34+CD38+cells
during GM-CSF and chemotherapy treatment compared to chemotherapy
alone
Discussion
The current results of the study presented here support the idea
of the beneficial use of growth factors in combination with chemotherapy
in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The results of multiple studies
reflect the impact of the use intensive chemotherapy regimens in
induction of ALL (2,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,16,18,22,23,25,27,30) to achieve
rapid cytoreduction, but it is important balance the antileukemic
effect with the minimal myelotoxicity (14). In the German Multicentre
Adult ALL Trial the granulocytopenia has appeared the major dose
limiting toxicity, leading to delay or discontinuation of therapy
and most investigators have demonstrated that an induction failure
is equally due to the toxicity and to the refractoriness t0 chemotherapy
(14). The use of recombinant growth factos such G-CSF and GM-CSF
in the management of lymphoid malignancies have demonstrated their
effectiveness in supportion of myelopoiesis, a good tolerability
(4,8,11,13,18,24,25) with no evidence of malignant lymphoid clones
stimulation (1,3,15,17,20,26). In addition to supportive function
of growth factors in cytopenia, new perspectives have been offered
based on prewious data suggesting that 48-96 hour period after discontinuation
of GM-CSF administration represents a period of relative refractoriness
of normal progenitors to cell cycle specyfic chemotherapy (1,3,5,12,26,28).
Based on these findings we developed a novel remission induction
protocol, and the data presented here confirm its efficacy. Our
flow cytometric findings of kinetic charnges of peripheral blood
CD34 CD38 posivite cells during and after GM-CSF treatment appear
to confirm that a period of relative refractoriness of normal stem
and progenitor cells may be obtained using properly sequenced administration
of rhGM-CSF and cytostatic drugs. Rapid granulopoietic reconstitution,
as well as a rather unexpected shorter platelets recovery time,
achieved in GM-CSF group should be considered as an another evidence
of cytoprotection on multilineage stem cell level. Complete remission
has been achiewed significantly more rapidly in patients receiving
GM-CSF in addition to chemotherapy and this finding is of great
importance. At first it confirs the value of the above discussed
policy and secondly it has a prognostic value predicting for a longer
remission duration. Data from large series of ALL patients demontrated
that a short induction treatment duration , is an one of the most
important parameters predicting long term disease free survival
( 9, 10, 11 ). Further investigations are needed to explain the
accelerated reduotion of leukemic cells during GMCSF administration.
A priming effect of secondary secreted cytokines as well as activation
of immunological mechanisms of tumor control should be taken into
consideration. In summary, the protocol employing GM-CSF has following
advantages in comparison to chemotherapy alone: shorter time to
CR, (p<0.05), CR in all cases obtained after 1 chemotherapy cycle,
accelerated blasts cytoreduction (p=0.05), accelerated hematopoietic
reconstitution ( p<0.05 ), better outcome of treatment with lower
incidence and severity of infections. The use GM-CSF during high
dose consolidation treatment permits close adherence to planned
chemotherapy without delay. Our clinical data supported by flow
cytometric findings confirm the idea of a cell kinetics based protection
of stem cells in ALL, using properly sequenced chemotherapy and
GM-CSF .
The study protocol received the Local Ethics Commitee agreement.
This trial was subvenced in part by Polish Research Comitee, Grant
No.406669101
Participating centers Dept of Hematology Medical Academy Katowice,
Deptof Hematology MA Gdansk,lnstitute of Hematology Warsaw, Deptof
Hematology M.A Lublin, Deptof Hematology M.A Lodz, Deptof Hematolgy
MA Warsaw, Dept of Hematology MA Krakow
Bibliography
Aglietta M. Piacibello W.et al.Kinetics of Human Hematopoietic
Cells After in Vivo Administration of Granulocyte Macrophage Colony
Stimulating Factor J.Clin.lnvest.1989.83.
Anglin P.Keating A.Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with
a Pediatric High Risk Protocol. Single Centre Report of 50 Consecutive
Cases.Blood.1993.83(10)SuppI1
Bernstein I.D.,Andrews R.G.Recombinant Human Stem Cell Factor Enhances
the Formation of Colonies by CD 341in- Cells and the Generation
of the Colony Forming Cell Progeny from CD 34+lin-Cells Cultured
with Interleukin 3,Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor
or Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor .Blood.1991.77.
Blaise D,Vernant JP,Fiere D,Gluckman E, Reiffers J,et al.A Randomized
Controlled Multicentre Trial of Filgrastim in Patients Treated by
Bone Marrow Transplantation with Total Body Irradiation for Acute
Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma.Congress Abstract
Review,34 th Annual Meeting of American Society of Hematology"Growth
Factors in Hematology "December, 1992
Broxmeyer HE,Benninger L,PateIS,Benjamin RS, Vadhan-Rai S,Differences
in Kinetics Responses of Human Marrow Myeloid Progenitor Cells to
in Vivo Treatment of G-CSF and GMCSF.Congress Abstract Review,34
th Annual Meeting of American Society of Hematology"Growth Factors
in Hematology "December,1992
Casssileth P.A.Andersen J.W.Bennett J.M.et al.Adult Acute Lymphocytic
Leukemia:The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Leukemia.
1992. 6 Suppl 2
Gale R.P.Butturini A.Controversies in Therapy of Acute Lymphoblastic
Leukemia. Leukemia. 1992. 6, Suppl 2
Gerhartz H.H.,Englehard M,Meusers P,et al.Randomized Double Blind,Placebo
Controlled Phase III Study of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Macrophage
Colony Stimulating Factor as Adjunct to Induction Treatment of High
Grade Malignant Non Hodkin Lymphomas.Blood, Vol 82,No 8,1993,pp.2329
Hoelzer D. Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Adult Acute Lymphoblastic
Leukemia.Hematol-Oncol-Clin North-Am.1993 Feb:7(1) 139-60
Hoelzer D., Therapy of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults.Leukemia.1992.6,Suppl
2.
Hoelzer D.Thiel E.Ludwig WD.Loffler H.,Buchner TH.,Freud M.,et al.The
German Multicentre Trials for Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Leukemia.1992
6.Suppl2
Holowiecki J.,Cedrych I.et al.Efficacy of an Original Cell Kinetics
Based Chemotherapy Regimen Using rHuGM-CSF for Induction and Consolidation
Treatment of ALL. Preliminary Analysis.Acute Leukemias IV.Springer-Verlag
Berlin Heidelberg 1993
Link H,Boogaerts MA,Carella AM,et al.A Controlled Trial of Recombinant
Human GranulocyteMacrophage Colony Stimulating Factor after Total
Body Irradiation, High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Bone Marrow
Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Malignant Lymphoma
Blood 1992, Nov 1,80(9) 2188-95
Linker C.A.Levitt L. J.et al. Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic
Leukemia with Intensive Cyclical Chemotherapy:A Follow uo Report.
Blood.1991. 78.
Lord B.I.,Molineux G.et al.Myeloid Cell Kinetics in Mice Treated
with Recombinant Interleukin 3,Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating
Factor or Granulocyte Stimulating Factor.Blood.1991.77.
Mandelli F.Annino L. Vegna M.L.GIMEMA ALL 0288 : a Multicentric
Study on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Preliminary Results.
Leukemia. 1992 6.SuppI2.
Ode D.L.Zhou M.et al.The Effect of Recombinant GM-CSF and G-CSF
on the Bone Marrow Cells of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Leukemia.1992.6(11)
Ottman OG,Hoelzer D,.Concomitant rmetHuG-CSF(Filgrastim) and Intensive
Chemoradiotherapy as Induction Treatment in Adult ALL.A Randomized
Multicenter Phase III trial.Blood.1993.83(10)SuppI1
Reynoso E.E.Duenas S.Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor
( GM-CSF ) to Atenuate the Hematological Toxicity of Phase II Induction
of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood.1993. 83 ( 10) Suppl
1
Ridgway D.Borzy M.S.Differential Effect of Continous versus Cyclic
Maintenance Chemotherapy on Cytokine Induced Myeloid Colony Growth.Hematol.
Pathol.1990.4.87.
Ridgway D.Borzy M.S.Defective Production of Granulocyte Macrophage
Colony Stimulating Factor and Interleukin 1 by Mononuclear Cells
from Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Leukemia
1992.6.
Scherrer R.Geissler K.et al.Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
as an Adjunct to Induction Chemotherapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic
Leukemia.Ann.Hematol.1993.66.(6)
Schiffer C.A. Larson R.A. Bloomfield C.D.Cancer and Leukemia Study
Group B ( CALGB) Studies in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Leukemia.
1992. 6,Suppl2
Schulz G.Frish J.et al.New Therapeutic Modalities for the Clinical
Use of th GM-CSF in Patients with Malignancies.Am.J. Clin.Oncol.1991.14.
Smedmyr B.Glycosylated rHuG-CSF as Supportive Treatment During Remission
InductionTherapy for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed ALL\AUL.Blood.1993
Strauss L.C.Welsh S.B.et al.lnitiation of DNA Synthesis by Colony
Stimulating Factors in Subsets of Human CD34+Marrow Cells. Exp.
Hematol.1991.19.
Stryckmans P.De Witte TH.et al. Therpay of Adult ALL:overview of
2 succesive EORTC studies :( ALL -2 & ALL -3 ) .Leukemia. 1992 6
Suppl 2
Vadhan Rai S.Hal. E. et al.Abrogating Chemotherapy Induced Myelosupression
by Recombinant Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor
in Patients with Sarcoma. Protection at the Progenitor Cell Level.J
.Clin. Oncol.1992.1 ).
Welte K.Mernpel K.Reiter A,et al.A Randomized Phase III Study of
Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ( rmet Hu
G-CSF) in Childchood High risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood
1993.83 (10) Suppl1
Weiss M.Berman E.Rapid Remission Induction Therpay in Adult Acute
Lymphoblastic Leukemia Without VCR or Prednisone.Blood 1993.83 (10)
Suppl 1
|