1 Department of Hematology/Oncology*,
2 Pharmaceutical Division, and
3Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital; and the Departments of Pediatrics and Radiation Oncology,
University of Tennessee, Memphis, College of Medicine, Memphis,
Tennessee 38105, USA
* Supported by National Cancer Institute grants CA-21765 and CA-20180,
and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).
A. Introduction
During the past decade, evidence from clinical trials for children
with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) indicates that improved end results
can be obtained by use of intensified early therapy (1-5]. Such
improvement has been especially apparent for children judged to
be at higher risk of relapse based on prognostic factor analysis.
Risk assessment based upon the clinical features of patients at
diagnosis (e.g., age, WBC count, and race) and the biologic features
of their leukemic blast cells (e.g., immunophenotype and karyotype)
has made it possible to modify therapy in rational ways. Additionally,
alternative methods of irradiation for the treatment of preclinical
CNS leukemia have been shown to be highly effective for children
with non- Bcell ALL. Newer approaches to effective CNS prophylaxis
include use of socalled, triple intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy (methotrexate
(MTX), hydrocortisone, cytosine arabinoside (ara-C)] given early
and throughout one or more years of treatment (6]. In the St. Jude
Total XI study (19841988), intensive early treatment with seven
agents is being used for remission induction; this phase of therapy
is followed by consolidation with high-dose MTX. During continuation
treatment, we are evaluating the use of pairs of effective antileukemic
drugs alternated either weekly or every 6 weeks throughout the entire
duration of therapy (120 weeks). The risk of relapse is assessed
by anew system based on prognostic factor analysis of data obtained
in the Total X study (7]. Age, WBC count, race, DNA index, and chromosome
translocation were most predictive of relapse in our Total X Study
(7] and, therefore, are being used to determine risk status in the
Total XI study. A summary of the efficacy and toxicity of early
therapy in the Total XI trial, and plans for our next study (Total
XII), form the basis of this report.
B. Patients and Methods
Between March 1984 and May 1988, we treated 332 consecutive children
with non- B-cell ALL according to the Total XI protocol. The diagnosis
of ALL is based on morphologic evaluation of Wright-stained smears
of bone marrow and negative marrow myeloperoxidase preparations
( < 3% positive blasts). CNS disease is defined as greater than
five mononuclear cells/mm3 on a CSF cell count and blasts seen on
a cytospin preparation. Complete remission is defined as < 5% marrow
blasts and signs of recovery of normal hematopoiesis. Detailed immonologic
marker studies including surface immunoglobulin (Slg) evaluation
are performed on all cases to rule out B-cell ALL and to define
other major
Table 1. Criteria for risk assignment
in Total Therapy Study XI
immunophenotypes (T, pre-B and common). All surface Ig-negative cases are included herein and detailed results of the immunologic studies will be summarized in a separate report. Flow cytometry to establish the ratio of the DNA content of leukemic versus normal cells (DNA index) and cytogenetic studies to determine the leukemic cell karyotype are successful in over 95% of cases. Results of these studies will be described separately.
The clinical and biologic features that determine risk assignment are shown in Table 1, together with the estimated relative risk of treatment failure for each factor, as determined by Cox regression model analysis of data from 431 patients treated from 1979 to 1983 in our preceding Total X study. We recently published two reports summarizing the results of Total X, including details of the risk model noted above and end results at a median follow-up time of 4 years [1, 7]. The five factors noted in Table 1 were most predictive of outcome in Total X and therefore were used for risk assignment in Total XI. The presence of any two of these features resulted in a worserisk assignment; a WBC count of over lOO x 10 high 9 /liter was sufficient by itself to confer a worse risk classification.
The details of therapy including drug schedule, dosage, and duration of administration are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. In brief, seven highly effective agents are used for induction treatment, given over 8 weeks; CNS prophylaxis with IT
chemotherapy is started early in this phase of treatment. High-dose MTX (2 g/m² given intravenously over 2 h with 6 h of hydration and urinary alkalinization) is begun on day 43 and is repeated 1 week later. Leucovorin rescue is given at a dose of 30 mg/m² at 32,44, and 48 h, followed by 5 mg/m² at 56 and 68 h. These doses are intended to achieve total reduced folate serum concentrations above MTX concentrations at 44 hand equimolar levels until MTX concentrations are less than 0.05 µmol/liter .
Three regimens were employed as continuation therapy. One-third of the better-risk patients receive conventional continuation treatment 1 (6-MP, MTX, vincristine, and prednisone) and twothirds receive treatment 2, which is experimental and consists of drug pairs rotated weekly as shown in Fig. 2. Worse-risk patients are randomized unequally between experimental treatment 2 (two-thirds) and experimental treatment 3 ( one-third). Relatively non-cross-resistant effective drug pairs with different toxicities are used and rotated either weekly (treatment 2) or every 6 weeks (treatment 3); this allows us to evaluate the effect of rapid versus slower rotation of drug pairs. Both treatments use the same drug pairs administered at identical doses. Further, this intensive continuation therapy is continued for the entire length of treatment rather than only during early therapy. Continuation therapy given is based on the patient's absolute phagocyte count (absolute number of
early myeloid forms and segmented neutrophils plus monocytes). Full doses of chemotherapy are given if the absolute phagocyte count level exceeds 0.5 x 10 high 9/ liter; otherwise doses are skipped and not delayed.
Central nervous system prophylaxis is continued for 1 year based on available data from studies of the Pediatric Oncology Group (ALinC 11, 12, 13), which suggest that such therapy is effective, especially for better-risk patients [6, 8]. Patients with CNS leukemia at diagnosis or those at worse risk also receive delayed cranial irradiation (2400 or 1800 cGy, respectively) after 1 year of remission. The results are sequentially analyzed and appropriate stopping rules are incorporated to avoid continuing the study unnecessarily.
C. Results
I. Patient Accrual and Risk Distribution
As of 1 May 1988, 335 patients had been enrolled in the Total XI
study. Only three of these children were not evaluable ( one refused
therapy, two had incorrect diagnoses). Of 332 evaluable children,
107 (32%) were considered standard risk and 225 (68%) worse risk.
Thirteen percent of the patients are black and 3.0% are infants
( <_ 1 year of age). Twenty-five percent are over 10 years of age,
but under 18 years. Seventeen percent have a WBC count greater than
lOO x 10 high 9/liter. The proportion of worse-risk patients is
much higher than we had anticipated largely due to an increased
number of patients with chromosomal translocations, as compared
with results in the Total X study. This circumstance resulted primarily
from improvements in our cytogenetic techniques during the Total
X study which led to better detection of subtle translocations in
Total XI. Ninety-seven percent (321/332) of our patients had successful
immunologic marker studies and DNA indices performed on leukemic
blast cells. Banded karyotypes were available for over 90% of the
patients. The toxicity encountered during the induction phase of
therapy is summarized in Table 2. It can be seen that the major
problems encountered were infectious in nature and developed during
periods of neutropenia. A relatively increased rate of seizures
noted early in the course of Total XI was largely corrected by changing
the schedule of intrathecal therapy during induction treatment.
Table 2. Toxic effects during induction
therapy
II. Early Results of Therapy
The complete remission (CR) rate for all patients is 96% (318/332).
Of the 318 patients attaining CR, 106 (99%) of 107 better-risk patients
and 212 (94% )/225 worse-risk patients achieved CR. Of the 14 patients
who did not attain initial remission ( early failures ), 6 had primary
drug resistance and 8 died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Since
we revised the induction phase of chemotherapy, the tolerance to
treatment has improved and, in fact, one-third of children receive
the early phase of therapy as outpatients. Ninety-seven percent
of the planned doses of induction treatment have been given and
85% of patients received all planned therapy (Table 2). Ninety-six
percent of children have received the two courses of high-dose MTX
consolidation in the "day hospital" setting. Three hundred and eight
patients have been randomized to receive continuation therapy as
follows: better risk, treatment 1 (n = 37); better risk, treatment
(n = 61); worse risk, treatment 2 (n = 139); worse risk, treatment
3 (n = 71). Three patients were not randomized and received other
therapies after CR induction. The tolerance to continuation treatment
for each of the randomized treatment regimens has been excellent
and most treatment is delivered in the outpatient setting. It is
too early to report the durations of remission on the three treatment
regimens of Study XI (the median follow-up time is only 2 years).
However, event-free survival (EFS) is estimated to be significantly
better than the result obtained in Total Therapy Study X.
D. Comments
These results indicate that a high remission induction rate (96%)
can be ob tained without undue toxicity in children with non- BALL
using a seven-drug induction regimen that features early administration
of VM-26 and ara-C (at days 22, 25, and 26) and high-dose MTX (at
days 44 and 51). The rationale for this treatment is that very early
use of multiple effective agents may eradicate larger numbers of
leukemic cells before the emergence of drug resistance, yielding
improved end results with acceptable toxicity. Another notable feature
of the Total XI treatment is use of intensification therapy, not
only early but sustained throughout 120 weeks of continuation treatment.
It is also of interest that CNS prophylaxis for one-third of patients
who have had a lower risk of relapse does not include irradiation
and that cranial irradiation for worse-risk patients or those with
CNS disease at diagnosis is delayed for 1 year, permitting better
tolerance to systemic therapy and sparing patients who relapse early
in the bone marrow from the toxic effects of irradiation. The isolated
CNS relapse rate in Study XI is currently < 2%, and all continuation
therapy has been administered in an outpatient setting. The toxicity
has been modest in all phases of treatment. We are encouraged by
the comparatively low relapse rate in this study; at the time of
the most recent analysis, duration of event-free survival was superior
to that seen in the preceding clinical trial, although follow-up
times are too short for Study XI for statistically meaningful evaluation.
From experience in Total XI, combined with that in studies of patients
with ALL in relapse, we believe that the epidophyllotoxins VM-26
and VP-16 warrant further evaluation in clinical trials for children
with newly diagnosed ALL. Information demonstrating that highdose
MTX may be more effective if systemic exposure is optimized [7,
9] indicates that such therapy may be especially effective for patients
with better-risk ALL. Fixed dosing of each of these three agents
results in a wide variation in systemic exposure among patients
and
Fig.3. Schema for planned Total XII study for children
with non-E ALL showing general treatment plans and expected differences
in systemic drug exposure between patient groups receiving fixed
dosing versus those getting "modeled" drug delivery. Fixed, constant
drug dosage; TSE, targeted systemic exposure
among successive courses administered to individual patients, and
lower steadystate plasma drug concentrations may be associated with
inferior treatment outcome [9, 10]. Our collective experience with
the pharmacokinetic evaluation of each of these agents has permitted
us to plan a study that will further test the potential of pharmacokinetically
modeled therapy for improving the clinical outcome of children with
non-B-cell ALL. Therefore, in our Total XII study (Fig. 3), we will
evaluate the impact of "modeled" administration of VM-26, ara-C,
and high-dose MTX to maintain a narrow range of predetermined systemic
exposure within one group of patients as compared with a fixed-dose
approach in another group. Patients will be stratified by WBC count,
age, race, and DNA index to assure prognostic uniformity of the
groups being compared. Induction therapy will be given as in the
Total XI study, and all biologic studies performed in Total XI will
be repeated in Total XII. CNS prophylaxis will consist of periodic
triple IT chemotherapy with CNS irradiation only in patients with
high WBC levels. Periodic pulsed VM-26 and ara-C and high-dose MTX
will be given to both groups using the aforementioned methods of
drug administration, and 6-MP and IM MTX will be given between pulses
during the first 60 weeks (Fig. 3). Thereafter, only the latter
two drugs will be given (for 120 weeks). This research should provide
data regarding the value of optimized systemic exposure to these
effective agents as compared with the highly variable exposure seen
with standard dosing. If significantly improved responses can be
demonstrated in the former group, we will have obtained support
for the concept that systemic exposure of leukemic cells to chemotherapy
impacts favorably on cure rates in childhood ALL.
References
1. Dahl GV, Rivera GK, Look AT, Hustu HO, Kalwinsky DK, Abromowitch
M, Mirro J, Ochs J, Murphy SB, Dodge RK, Pui C-H (1987) Teniposide
plus cytarabine improves outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic
leukemia presenting with a leukocyte count> 100 x 10 high 9 /L.
J Clin Onco15:1015-1021
2. Riehm H, Feickert H-J, Lampert F (1986) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
In: Voute PA, Barrett A, Bloom Jet al. (eds) UICC cancer in children:
clinical management, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York,
pp 101-118
3. Steinherz PG, Gaynon P, Miller DR, Reaman G, Bleyer A, Finklestein
J, Evans RG, Meyers P, Steinherz LJ, Sather H, Hammond D (1986)
Improved diseasefree survival of children with acute lymphoblastic
leukemia at high risk for early relapse with the New York regimen
a new intensive therapy protocol: a report from the Children Cancer
Study Group. J Clin Oncol 4: 744- 752
4. Clavell LA, Gelber RD, Cohen HJ, Hitchcock-Bryan S, Cassady JR,
Tarbell NJ, Blattner SR, Tantravahi R, Leavitt P, Sallan SE (1986)
Four-agent induction and intensive asparaginase therapy for treatment
of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 315: 657-663
5. Rivera GK, Mauer AM (1987) Controversies in the management of
childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: treatment intensification,
CNS leukemia, and prognostic factors. Semin Hematol 24: 12- 26
6. Sullivan MP, Chen T, Dyment PG, Hvizdala E, Steuber CP (1982)
Equivalence of intrathecalchemotherapy and radiotherapyas central
nervous system prophylaxis in children with acute lymphatic leukemia:
a pediatric oncology group study. Blood 60: 948 -958
7. Abromowitch M, Ochs J, Pui C-H, Fairclough D, Murphy SB, Rivera
GK (1988) Efficacy of high-dose methotrexate in childhood acute
lymphocytic leukemia: analysis by contem porary risk classifications.
Blood 71: 866-869
8. Pullen J, Boyett J, Frankel L, Iyer R, Van Eys J, Crist W, Harris
M, Ravindranath Y, Sullivan M (1988) Extended triple intrathecal
(T.I.T.) chemotherapy provides effective central nervous system
(CNS) prophylaxis for both good and poor prognosis patients with
non- T, non-B, acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL); substitution of
intermediate dose methotrexate (IDM for T.I. T. after consolidation
provides less effective protection for the CNS). Proc ASCO 7: 176
(abstr no 681)
9. Evans WE, Crom WR, Abromowitch M, Dodge R, Look AT, Bowman WP,
George SL, Pui C-H (1986) Clinical pharmacodynamics ofhigh-dose
methotrexate in acute lymphocytic leukemia: identification of a
relation between concentration and effect. N Engl J Med 314(8):
471-477
10. Rodman JH, Abromowitch M, Sinkule JA, Hayes FA, Rivera GK, Evans
WE (1987) Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide:
systemic exposure as a determinant or response in a Phase I trial.
J Clin Oncol 5: 1007-1014
|